Egypt 2013: The people pining for Mubarak
Egypt’s story of the last three years is one of a tiny baby becoming a petulant toddler. It is now at a climatic point– will it enter its bildungsroman, its arduous but worthwhile journey on the way to maturity and greatness; or is it about to enter the dark years of adolescence and finish up in the gutter?
Remember
the optimism? Remember the unbridled, unquashable joy of eighty-million souls
when their oppressive, half-a-century dictator had finally been toppled, as if
somehow analogizing the situation to knocking down a statue would make
everything alright? But we’re too cynical in the West. For the first time, the
Arab Spring represented the world’s most turbulent region coming together – not
in extremism or oil production but in what seemed to be a force for good. What
a let-down. Twice the country has been placed under martial law. Where Mubarak
lasted for 30 years, Morsi couldn’t even manage one. Perhaps Dan Mazer’s comedy
‘I Give it A Year’, released in 2013, would have been more apt in predicting
the fortunes of future leaders in Egypt.
But why has the
Egyptian dream gone so wrong? What should be made of this corruptible form of
democracy that seems to be the new norm in this ancient and beautiful country?
These are questions which the world is now struggling to comprehend. Rightly
so, because there is no simple answer. The country is a complete mess; it
threatens to dissolve into War-of-the-Roses-esque chaos as factions of even the
same Islamic faith, political, extremist and conventional, fight for the right
to be…elected?
Perhaps there is an
alternative, radical solution. One which would permanently bring about a future
of power, peace and prosperity. The Egyptians are crying out for a leader, to
silence the ubiquitous voices of discontent. Someone like Hosni Mubarak. It may
prima facie appear to be the last
thing Egypt and its people want to return to; decades of poverty, nepotism and
human rights abuses. But absolute power doesn’t always have to be that way. The
17th century philosopher Thomas Hobbes, himself seeking for his
deeply divided England a better future, argued that a social contract was
necessary between the state and the people; protection of rights, economic
support and the ability to thrive – in exchange for absolute submission to the
leader’s authority. One who is able to grow and develop the country, to change
its trajectory forever. Would this really be such a terrible step to return to?
What would Egyptians truly prefer, under the surface of their rightful protests;
the majestic serenity and prosperity of a ‘nice’ Mubarak; or five Mohammed
Morsis dragging the economy a little further down an inevitable hill, their brief
reigns juxtaposed by military interregnum which rolls Egypt’s outlook into the
valley below? The crowds filling Tahrir Square and every corner of this
once-great nation have been praised, eulogized and criticized in equal measure;
for their noble sacrifices in the name of democracy and their incompetence in
upholding it. Yet the unspoken elephant in the room, the toy that has been
thrown out of the pram in haste, is that complete power may be the only way to
unite Egypt. The greatest ancient power of them all can become great again. The
questions for Egypt are now thus: is it willing to sacrifice individual power
and freedom for the greater good? And will another Mubarak have the bravery to
seize power, the brutality to enforce it, and the dignity to use it wisely?
Thucydides - out.
If you enjoyed reading and want to hear more, why not bookmark my page on delicious or digg https://delicious.com/thucydides
If you enjoyed reading and want to hear more, why not bookmark my page on delicious or digg https://delicious.com/thucydides
No comments:
Post a Comment